<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>comments | Release Later, Release Better | typewriting</title>
	<link href="http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/"/>
	<updated>2006-06-04T12:07:25-07:00</updated>
	<id>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/</id>
	<subtitle>Most recent comments for Release Later, Release Better on typewriting.org</subtitle>
<entry>
					<title>Comment by Abe</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2775"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							why not both? is there any reason you can't both release early and often and then release later and better as well? Does releasing early mean you can't take the time to also improve?
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2006-06-04T12:07:25-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2775</id>
                	<author>
						<name>Abe</name>
					</author>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>Comment by Scott Reynen</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2776"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							I'm doing independent development in my free time. For me, releasing early has meant few use what I make, I don't know why they don't use it, so I don't know how to improve it. And even fewer use the second revision in this age of betas. Basically, first impressions matter.
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2006-06-04T12:38:47-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2776</id>
                	<author>
						<name>Scott Reynen</name>
					</author>
				</entry></feed>
