<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>comments | Release Later, Release Better | typewriting</title>
        <description>Most recent comments for Release Later, Release Better on typewriting.org</description>
        <link>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 12:07:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>typewriting.org</generator>
    <item>
					<title>Comment by Abe</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2775</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;why not both? is there any reason you can't both release early and often and then release later and better as well? Does releasing early mean you can't take the time to also improve?&lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 12:07:25 -0700</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2775</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>Comment by Scott Reynen</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2776</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;I'm doing independent development in my free time. For me, releasing early has meant few use what I make, I don't know why they don't use it, so I don't know how to improve it. And even fewer use the second revision in this age of betas. Basically, first impressions matter.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 12:38:47 -0700</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/05/31/Release_Later%2C_Release_Better/#comment-2776</guid>
				</item></channel>
</rss>
