<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>comments | Election 2006: Judges | typewriting</title>
        <description>Most recent comments for Election 2006: Judges on typewriting.org</description>
        <link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:51:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>typewriting.org</generator>
    <item>
					<title>Comment by Julie</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4289</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;I went to the site that you recommended but still I found no answer to my question.  I do not know their political leanings.  Where can one go to find out? &lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:51:23 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4289</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>Comment by Scott Reynen</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4290</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;Julie, I couldn't find any information about party affiliation for judges. I don't think they normally declare any. I believe all of the Court of Appeals judges were appointed by Vilsack, so that might indicate liberal tendencies. Other than that, I tried to find records of their case history, but I didn't find much that gave me any idea of political leanings. Please let me know if you find anything better.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:50:45 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4290</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>Comment by Iowa Voter</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4296</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;I am glad to see others researching judges prior to the election.  Although the Iowa Bar Association&amp;#8217;s document is helpful, it is not always a good measurement on how well they are performing.  I spend TOO MANY hours researching these judges and some of these judges should be voted out despite how other lawyers feel they are performing.  For example, in a previous election, a district judge was found having sex with the district county attorney in the court house.  She was disbarred and he got several months of unpaid vacation time.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:19:36 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4296</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>Comment by Iowa Voter</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4297</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;By the way, here are a few resources if your many readers are inclined to research the judges before Election Day:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.freedomstatesalliance.com/ArmingDomesticAbusers.pdf"&gt;Arming Domestic Abusers: Failure of Iowa Courts to Uphold Federal Law That Prohibits Possession of Firearms to Domestic Abusers&lt;/a&gt; [PDF]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.iowabar.org/miscdocuments.nsf/2b85a4ea12f4bfac8625669d006e27ab/f64955eec7403790862571fc00519308/$FILE/2006%20Plebiscite%20Results%20IA%20Lawyer.pdf"&gt;The Iowa State Bar Associate 2006 Judicial Plebiscite&lt;/a&gt; [PDF]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.iowansconcernedaboutjudges.com/"&gt;Iowans Concerned About Judges&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:27:22 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4297</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>Comment by Mikael</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4299</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;Judges are just lawyers in fancy robes.  Vote them all out until we can get Iowa's judicial system reformed.  &lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:26:35 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4299</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>Comment by Vicki</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4301</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;I have to admit that I also voted for ppl (especially judges) based on content I found on the internet. I have strong views on certain subjects, so the US Rep was pretty easy for me to decide.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:55:21 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4301</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>Comment by Brian</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4309</link>
					<description>&lt;div&gt;That is an interesting stance, Mikael.  You do realize that each judge voted out will be replaced by another appointed judge.  A judge whom you will vote not to retain having done no investigation.  Sounds like a really good plan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Plebiscite survey seems to be a solid source. Here are a few more good resources for those of you who would like to make educated decisions next time around. http://www.ajs.org/js/IA.htm                  http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/  &lt;/div&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:01:52 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/10/29/Election_2006%3A_Judges/#comment-4309</guid>
				</item></channel>
</rss>
