<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>typewriting</title>
	<link href="http://typewriting.org/"/>
	<updated>2009-03-14T22:01:45-07:00</updated>
	<id>http://typewriting.org/</id>
	<subtitle>Most recent articles on typewriting.org</subtitle>
<author>
			<name>Scott Reynen</name>
		</author><entry>
					<title>The Beginning of the End</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2009/03/14/The_Beginning_of_the_End/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>In <a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/">Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable</a>, Clary Shirky writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>When reality is labeled unthinkable, it creates a kind of sickness in an industry. Leadership becomes faith-based, while employees who have the temerity to suggest that what seems to be happening is in fact happening are herded into Innovation Departments, where they can be ignored <em>en masse</em>. This shunting aside of the realists in favor of the fabulists has different effects on different industries at different times.</p></blockquote>
<p>On reading this, I started wondering: what might this look like in the advertising industry? And it occurred to me that it might look a lot like <a href="http://tjcnyc.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/tide-loads-of-hope-pg-digital-hack-night-executive-summary/">some of the largest advertisers in the world trying desperately (and failing) to apply traditional models to a new landscape</a>. At risk of being moved to the Innovation Department (I work at an ad agency), some realism: broadcasting without listening doesn't work in systems designed for conversation. And fake listening doesn't scale. Back to Shirky, with some edits by me:</p>
<blockquote><p>Round and round this goes, with the people committed to saving <del>newspapers</del> <ins>advertising</ins> demanding to know “If the old model is broken, what will work in its place?” To which the answer is: Nothing. Nothing will work. There is no general model for <del>newspapers</del> <ins>advertising</ins> to replace the one the internet just broke.</p></blockquote>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2009/03/14/The_Beginning_of_the_End/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2009-03-14T22:01:45-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2009/03/14/The_Beginning_of_the_End/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>The Internet is Passive</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/12/17/The_Internet_is_Passive/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>Many articles about "the internet" are very wrong, and the flaws generally stem from a common source: implying, if not explicitly stating, that the internet does something. It doesn’t. It’s not sentient. It only allows <em>people</em> to do things.</p>
<p>As an example of this, <a href="http://bookowl.blogspot.com/">Dan</a> recently <a href="http://delicious.com/bookowl">bookmarked</a> <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/11/23/group_think/">an article from the Boston Globe subtitled "The turn to online research is narrowing the range of modern scholarship, a new study suggests"</a>. There's something interesting going on here, but this article completely misses it. It’s not that <em>the turn to online research</em> is narrowing the range of modern scholarship; it’s that <em>people</em> are narrowing the range of modern scholarship, and the internet is passively letting them do this.</p>
<p>By recognizing the actual actors here, we can ask much more useful questions. Did people always tend toward narrowing research, and only now are able? If so, why do people tend that way? And why weren’t they able before the internet? The answers to these questions might lead to improving the world, whereas assigning responsibility for what happens online to "the internet" is inherently defeatist. We can’t change what the internet does, because it doesn’t actually do anything.</p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/12/17/The_Internet_is_Passive/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-12-17T09:37:30-08:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/12/17/The_Internet_is_Passive/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>Just Semantics</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/10/16/Just_Semantics/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>One of my pet peeves is the phrase “just semantics,” often used to dismiss the importance of something. “Sure it’s more auburn than red,” they’ll say, “but that’s just semantics.” The implication is that it doesn’t matter so much what words mean. But I think it matters a great deal.</p>
<p>We think in words, so if our words are sloppy, that’s a pretty good indication our thoughts themselves are sloppy. And sloppy thinking leads to all manner of big problems. I came across an example of a semantics problem today that prompted me to write this. It’s so astoundingly awful I just can’t believe someone actually wrote it and thought they were saying something intelligent. Here it is, a paragraph from <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/16/go-get-yer-shiny-new-yahoo-profileand-make-some-connections/">TechCrunch</a>: <q>The other half of Yahoo’s YOS strategy centers on an open strategy, particularly around search - see our update from April where some of those features were discussed and released.</q></p>
<p>The catastrophe is in the first part: <q>Yahoo’s YOS strategy centers on an open strategy.</q> It’s problematic enough as-is, with the redundant “strategy.” But when you expand the YOS acronym, you get this: <q>Yahoo’s Yahoo Open Strategy strategy centers on an open strategy.</q> Wow. Two words repeated twice and one repeated three times, all in one sentence. That’s “just semantics,” but it’s also just so fundamentally bad that I seriously question the author’s ability to form coherent thoughts.</p>
<p>Don’s let this happen to you, kids. Remember: words mean things.</p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/10/16/Just_Semantics/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-10-16T14:12:28-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/10/16/Just_Semantics/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>QOTD: People Like to Debate</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/07/11/QOTD%3A_People_Like_to_Debate/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<blockquote><p>People like to debate the phenomenon of global climate change as if it were an academic issue. People who don't live in the path of the huang-sa dust storms that sweep in out of China to blanket Korea every spring, and get worse with each passing year, people who aren't in Central British Columbia watching 85% of the pine trees die off, and with the trees, the futures of their children. People whose health or livelihood isn't directly affected.</p></blockquote>
<p>— <a href="http://emptybottle.org/glass/2008/07/my_home_is_dying.php"><cite>Stavros the Wonder Chicken</cite>, My Home Is Dying</a></p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/07/11/QOTD%3A_People_Like_to_Debate/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-07-11T09:08:52-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/07/11/QOTD%3A_People_Like_to_Debate/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>4th of July Garlic</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/07/07/4th_of_July_Garlic/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>On this 4th of July, I found myself in need of antibiotics. I knew I needed antibiotics because I’d had the exact same symptoms a week prior, and an antibiotic, Cipro, had cured what ailed me. I suppose there’s a chance I could have developed the same symptoms for a completely different ailment within a week, but that seemed unlikely.</p>
<p>The 4th of July being a holiday in America, my doctor was not available to prescribe antibiotics again. And the 4th of July being a Friday this year, my doctor would not be available for 3 days. Faced with a decision between waiting it out or going to an urgent care facility, I sought help from the interwebs. A search for “over the counter antibiotic” soon lead me to an article titled <a href="http://washington.uwc.edu/about/faculty/ekunsanmi_t/OVER%20THE%20GROCERY%20COUNTER%20ANTIBIOTIC.htm"><cite>OVER THE GROCERY COUNTER ANTIBIOTIC - WILL ALLICIN REPLACE SOME COMMON ANTIBIOTICS?</cite></a> Allicin is found in garlic, and after reading the article, and determining it to be sufficiently science-y to trust, I decided that yes, it will replace some common antibiotics, for me anyway. So I ate a lot of garlic on the 4th of July.</p>
<div style="float: left; margin: 1em 1em 1em 0;"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/101/304917709_a1025b894e.jpg?v=0" alt="Garlic"/><p class="caption">photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zanastardust/304917709/">Zanastardust</a></p></div>
<p>When I took Cipro, I had a prescription for 3 days, to prevent <a href="http://www.fiercebioresearcher.com/story/super-resistant-soil-bacteria-can-thrive-on-antibiotics/2008-04-08">super bacteria</a>. Apparently whatever doesn’t kill them makes them stronger? But I felt better within a few minutes of taking the first Cipro pill. The first bite of garlic did not offer such immediate relief, but I kept eating.</p>
<p>I ate a large clove of garlic throughout the day, raw because cooked garlic doesn’t contain allicin. Not tasty, but toward the end of the day I was feeling better. Thanks internet! Thanks science!</p>
<p>Most pages discussing the antibiotic effects of garlic make some disclaimer about talking to your doctor first, but as I said, the whole reason I even started looking at garlic is that my doctor wasn’t available. If you find yourself in a similar situation, I recommend just eating some raw garlic. If it doesn’t help, you’ll just get bad breath and then you can do whatever you would have done without the garlic. But when it does help, it’s much simpler than a prescription for Cipro.</p>
<div style="clear: both;"/>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/07/07/4th_of_July_Garlic/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-07-07T05:57:07-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/07/07/4th_of_July_Garlic/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>Good Free MP3s on Amazon</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/14/Good_Free_MP3s_on_Amazon/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>This morning <a href="http://consumerist.com/379253/morning-deals">The Consumerist</a> kindly pointed us to a search on Amazon that returns quite a few <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=sr_f2_all?tag2=slickdeals&amp;tag=slickdeals&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;sort=price&amp;rh=i%3Adigital-music%2Ci%3Adigital-music-track">free MP3s</a>. The Consumerist says <q>No guarantee that they'll be any good, but hey, they're free!</q> I’ll go one further here and reduce the free MP3 list to songs I <strong>guarantee</strong> are good.</p>
<ul>
<li class="haudio"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Club/dp/B000S4G1QA/" rel="payment"><span class="audio-title">The Club</span> by <span class="contributor hcard"><span class="org fn">Nick Lowe</span></span></a></li>
<li class="haudio"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dead-Sound/dp/B0013IUTDG/" rel="payment"><span class="audio-title">Dead Sound</span> by <span class="contributor hcard"><span class="org fn">The Raveonettes</span></span></a></li>
<li class="haudio"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Energy/dp/B000TGGTIC/" rel="payment"><span class="audio-title">Energy</span> by <span class="contributor hcard"><span class="org fn">The Apples In Stereo</span></span></a></li>
<li class="haudio"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Jenny-Place-Your-Bets/dp/B000QP42IU/" rel="payment"><span class="audio-title">Jenny Place Your Bets</span> by <span class="contributor hcard"><span class="org fn">Dolorean</span></span></a></li>
<li class="haudio"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Led-Zeppelin-Sings-Dr-Seuss/dp/B000QQ2RAE/" rel="payment"><span class="audio-title">Led Zeppelin Sings Dr. Seuss</span> by <span class="contributor hcard"><span class="org fn">Mike Rayburn</span></span></a></li>
<li class="haudio"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Two-Times/dp/B000UG76N8/" rel="payment"><span class="audio-title">Two Times</span> by <span class="contributor hcard"><span class="org fn">The Blakes</span></span></a></li>
<li class="haudio"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Who-Taught-Live-Like-That/dp/B000S3DQUU/" rel="payment"><span class="audio-title">Who Taught You To Live Like That?</span> by <span class="contributor hcard"><span class="org fn">Sloan</span></span></a></li>
</ul>
<p>If you’re not satisfied by this musical selection, I’ll give you a full refund.</p>

							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/14/Good_Free_MP3s_on_Amazon/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-04-14T18:11:57-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/04/14/Good_Free_MP3s_on_Amazon/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>Live Through This</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/12/Live_Through_This/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>Back in university I had a lot of artsy friends. One of these friends, Sabrina Chapadjiev, got a bunch of artsy people together in a group to make some art. I played music and had long hair, but I’ve never really considered myself very artsy. When my theatre friends needed help with a play, I ran the audio equipment. But when Sabrina wrote a play, I somehow ended up in it. It wasn’t a major part, but I was on stage, which was uncomfortable. The play, called <cite>Perhaps Merely Quiet</cite>, became even more uncomfortable a couple days before it opened, when I discovered that it was largely autobiographical. That probably surprised me more than everyone else, since it was really kind of foolish of me to not have assumed from the beginning it was at least somewhat related to the writer’s life.</p>
<p>I gather from <a href="http://sabrinachap.com/theatrepage.htm">Sabrina’s website</a> that the play has changed a bit since the initial production, but the key theme of madness has remained. So amidst the chaos that always exists around a theatre production, to find out the director is to some extent using the play to recreate her own past madness, well, I found the experience somewhat disturbing. I really didn’t want to be responsible for helping someone self-destruct, and I had no idea if that’s what was happening. So after the play was done, I tried to stay away from that whole scene, which meant mostly staying away from Sabrina.</p>
<p>I still have friends who have maintained contact with Sabrina, though, so I’ve heard a little of what she’s been doing. She seems to have become a somewhat successful artist, notwithstanding my earlier concerns. And now she has a book, called <cite>Live Through This</cite>, available to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Live-Through-This-Creativity-Self-Destruction/dp/1583228276/">pre-order via Amazon</a>. The subtitle of the book is “On Creativity and Self-Destruction,” exactly what I was worried about back then. Somehow binding it up in a book makes it seem less scary and more impressive, though. I don’t have any of the same worries that this book will have some sort of harmful effect on anyone.</p>
<p>It doesn’t hurt that the book includes a list of prestigious contributors. Remember when I wrote <a href="http://typewriting.org/2007/01/14/Movement/#content">about bell hooks</a>? She’s one of the contributors to Sabrina’s book. So in my small world this makes Sabrina successful. Of course she was probably successful long ago, back when I knew her even, but I just realized it. And I guess my point here is just to say that I knew her when, that I was once a friend (albeit fair weather) of that author now on a book tour with somewhat famous people.</p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/12/Live_Through_This/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-04-12T10:06:42-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/04/12/Live_Through_This/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>My Vegetarianism</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/11/My_Vegetarianism/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p><a href="http://lettersunknown.com/archives/001207.html">Ezra Kilty</a> wrote a pretty good summary of why I’m vegetarian, which has little to do with the stereotypical “animals are people too” philosophy most people assign to me when they hear I don’t eat meat. I often half-jokingly say that I don’t like animals and I’m vegetarian because I want to eat their food source and starve them to death. This is only half-joking because starvation would be a natural, reasonable way for animals to die. Industrial meat farming, on the other hand, just doesn’t make any sense. There are a lot of things I still eat that also don’t make sense, but industrial meat is an extreme. It’s a clear aberration in the history of food, and I want nothing to do with it.</p>
<p>I part with Ezra here:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>… As living things, [animals] deserve not to be managed strictly as food items. They deserve to eat a diet that their digestion is adapted for, rather than one that fattens them up. (If they are meat-eaters, they deserve to eat other living things, rather than the ground bones of other industrially-farmed animals, which is commonly used as feed.) They deserve to roam, to graze—to follow their behaviors. The industrial system puts the animals in an extremely tight cycle of birth, feeding, waste removal, and slaughter, which is not a life.</p></blockquote>
<p>My own vegetarianism is more selfish. I don’t think animals deserve any of this, but I do think <em>I</em> deserve to live in a world where animals are treated like, well, the animals they are. The industrial meat industry (and the meat-rich diet that sustain it) upsets me in the same way someone claiming that 2 + 2 = 5 upsets me. It obviously doesn’t work, and I want my world to work.</p>
<p>Nature will acquiesce to most of our modern attempts to bypass it. Our highways through mountains, our televised realities, our internets all infringe on the way the world has optimized itself to work. But industrialized meat goes too far, rearranging the way life itself works. This can’t last. Nature will not adapt to this; it will give us mad cow diseases until <em>we</em> adapt. That doesn’t mean everyone has to be vegetarian, but we will have to eat much less meat. My vegetarianism is a proof-of-concept that this is still possible, that we can still back out of the broken food cycle we’ve created.</p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/11/My_Vegetarianism/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-04-11T06:55:26-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/04/11/My_Vegetarianism/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>Bought a House</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/10/Bought_a_House/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>We bought a house today, off Craigslist, without a realtor. Yeah, I know, that sounds really stupid. And maybe it was, but it still feels like a good deal. In <a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/02/03/No_Time_to_Write/#content">a previous post</a>, you’ll recall I said <q>We’ll know soon if we’re buying that or continuing to look.</q> We found out soon after that the house was being sold to someone else. And I was all ready to give up on buying a house and start looking at rental options when Jackie (my sister-in-law) found this house on Craigslist.</p>
<p>That was about a month ago; today we bought it. We won’t move for another month or so, but then my new address will be 460 S. Grant, Denver CO 80209. <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;client=safari&amp;q=460+S+Grant+St,+Denver,+CO+80209,+USA&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=39.711561,-104.984&amp;spn=0.010812,0.018024&amp;z=16&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=39.708262,-104.984028&amp;cbp=1,91.76151702879633,,0,4.832350948142998">Here it is on Google Maps (street view)</a>. One thing that came up in the inspection: despite what Google Maps shows, it’s not consistently sunny on the property. But it is sunny sometimes. Today was sunny.</p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/10/Bought_a_House/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-04-10T21:09:06-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/04/10/Bought_a_House/</id>
				</entry><entry>
					<title>Brains and Caffeine</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/04/Brains_and_Caffeine/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p>In “<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7326839.stm">Daily caffeine 'protects brain'</a>,” the BBC offers another explanation for <a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/03/28/My_Hippocampus/#content">my abnormal brain</a>. It’s too bad I’m so queasy around blood and organs; on a purely abstract level I find this kind of biology really interesting. You’ll recall I had previously suggested my brain started acting a little more like the brain of someone with Alzheimer's, a damaged hippocampus, roughly ten years ago. The BBC says:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Caffeine appears to block several of the disruptive effects of cholesterol that make the blood-brain barrier leaky," said Dr Jonathan Geiger, who led the study.</p>
<p>"High levels of cholesterol are a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, perhaps by compromising the protective nature of the blood brain barrier.</p></blockquote>
<p>This caught my attention. I never drank coffee, but I did stop drinking soft drinks about ten years ago, at the same time I stopped eating meat. In addition to saving money, I always thought this was an obviously healthy thing to do. It would be a sad irony if it actually broke my brain.</p>
<p>On the other hand, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffeine#Effects_on_memory_and_learning">Wikipedia’s caffeine article</a> (within an entire section on caffeine and memory) specifically says <q>Researchers have found that long-term consumption of low dose caffeine (0.3 g/L) slowed hippocampus-dependent learning and impaired long-term memory.</q> So the problem could actually be that I still consume <em>too much</em> caffeine, not too little (I eat a lot of chocolate). Sigh. Brains are complicated. Stay tuned for the next episode of “What’s Wrong with Scott’s Brain?”</p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2008/04/04/Brains_and_Caffeine/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2008-04-04T06:40:51-07:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2008/04/04/Brains_and_Caffeine/</id>
				</entry></feed>
