<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>typewriting tag: importance</title>
        <description>Most recent articles on typewriting.org for tag: importance</description>
        <link>http://typewriting.org/tag/importance/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:16:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>typewriting.org</generator>
    <item>
					<title>QOTD: Dissatisfied</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/02/19/QOTD%3A_Dissatisfied/#content</link>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're using electronic media to spread this benchmarking message far and wide. Because there's always a company offering a better or cheaper or faster product, or a person who's more clever than Oprah or cuter than Tyra, it's easy to shop around, to demand more, to be constantly dissatisfied.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212; &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/02/the_culture_of_.html"&gt;Seth Godin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dissatisfaction is the natural result when everything you don't have is &lt;a href="http://typewriting.org/2006/02/18/This_is_Important%21/"&gt;very important&lt;/a&gt;. I'm not convinced "relationships" is the solution, though. Seems a bit trite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://typewriting.org/2006/02/19/QOTD%3A_Dissatisfied/#comments"&gt;Comment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:16:17 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/02/19/QOTD%3A_Dissatisfied/</guid>
				</item><item>
					<title>This is Important!</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2006/02/18/This_is_Important%21/#content</link>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://my.opera.com/stopthefunny/blog/show.dml/148449"&gt;Stop The Funny#8482; writes&lt;/a&gt; &lt;q&gt;My personal view is that branding and marketing are, strategically, value free. What counts are the questions and answers you feed into the machine.&lt;/q&gt; I think this wrongly assumes the machine will accept any questions and answers. In reality, you can only market &lt;em&gt;for&lt;/em&gt; something's &lt;em&gt;increasing&lt;/em&gt; importance. There's no way to market the unimportance of something.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So we have marketing for the importance of Coke and marketing for the importance of Pepsi, but there's no marketing for the (true) idea that &lt;em&gt;neither&lt;/em&gt; are important. There's no one advertising &lt;em&gt;against&lt;/em&gt; anything. In many cases, it's even illegal to do so. I couldn't possibly run marketing saying "Coke is crap. It's just a bunch of chemicals that are rotting your body and some drugs that make you want to keep drinking it. And Pepsi is the same thing in a different package. Neither are important to your happiness or well-being, so stop buying them."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://typewriting.org/2006/02/18/This_is_Important%21/#comments"&gt;Comment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2006/02/18/This_is_Important%21/</guid>
				</item></channel>
</rss>
