<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>typewriting tag: morality</title>
	<link href="http://typewriting.org/tag/morality/"/>
	<updated>2005-12-16T19:46:56-08:00</updated>
	<id>http://typewriting.org/tag/morality/</id>
	<subtitle>Most recent articles on typewriting.org for tag: morality</subtitle>
<author>
				<name>Scott Reynen</name>
			</author><entry>
					<title>Movie Morals</title>
               		<link href="http://typewriting.org/2005/12/16/Movie_Morals/"/>
					<content type="xhtml">
						<div>
							<p><a href="http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,4120,1667600,00.html">The Guardian</a>: <q>the moral of King Kong is simpler still: "Don't pick a fight with nature."</q> <a href="http://ezrakilty.net/ezlog/archives/000831.html">Letters to an Unknown Audience</a>: <q>The message of <cite>Narnia</cite> is clear: Don't ask questions. Trust the first person you meet and stick with it. Raise your ill-begotten sword for it.</q> I haven't seen either, but I'm curious to what extent these morals are injected by the films' creators vs. viewers. I also think it would be an interesting thesis project to compile a list of morals as described by film critics over a few decades, correlate those morals to political party platforms with some sort of text similarity analysis, and then measure ticket sales against election results.</p>
							<p><a href="http://typewriting.org/2005/12/16/Movie_Morals/#comments">Comment</a></p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<updated>2005-12-16T19:46:56-08:00</updated>
                	<id>http://typewriting.org/2005/12/16/Movie_Morals/</id>
				</entry></feed>
