<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>typewriting tag: movie</title>
        <description>Most recent articles on typewriting.org for tag: movie</description>
        <link>http://typewriting.org/tag/movie/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:46:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>typewriting.org</generator>
    <item>
					<title>Movie Morals</title>
               		<link>http://typewriting.org/2005/12/16/Movie_Morals/#content</link>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,4120,1667600,00.html"&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;q&gt;the moral of King Kong is simpler still: "Don't pick a fight with nature."&lt;/q&gt; &lt;a href="http://ezrakilty.net/ezlog/archives/000831.html"&gt;Letters to an Unknown Audience&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;q&gt;The message of &lt;cite&gt;Narnia&lt;/cite&gt; is clear: Don't ask questions. Trust the first person you meet and stick with it. Raise your ill-begotten sword for it.&lt;/q&gt; I haven't seen either, but I'm curious to what extent these morals are injected by the films' creators vs. viewers. I also think it would be an interesting thesis project to compile a list of morals as described by film critics over a few decades, correlate those morals to political party platforms with some sort of text similarity analysis, and then measure ticket sales against election results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://typewriting.org/2005/12/16/Movie_Morals/#comments"&gt;Comment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
					<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:46:56 -0800</pubDate>
                	<guid>http://typewriting.org/2005/12/16/Movie_Morals/</guid>
				</item></channel>
</rss>
